There are currently 2 methods to modify profile by users, but the results are not the same. What is wrong?
Indeed, people who need to modify their profile should:
1. Start from the profile link added on every newsletter (method 1)
2. Using the page containing the shortcode [newsletter_profile] (method 2).
Yes, but it seems that the results are NOT the same: With the method 2, fields filled by users in their profile appear and could then definitively disappear after.
The actual shortcode [newsletter_profile] seems not stable.
In some situations using the page containing the shortcode is indispensable (method 2 instead of method 1).
How to ensure that the method 2 generates the same good results as the method 1?
Could Stefano and Newsletter Team kindly improve the shortcode [newsletter_profile] to solve this important issue?
Hi, the problem with your test could be raised by this situation: you are logged in with a user and you’re editing the profile of a subscriber not connected with that user. WP users and subscribers are not the same, if you start the profile editing from an email with a clean browser where you’re not logged in you should have no problems.
Anyway we’ll check the code and update the documentation to clarify situations like yours.